When a Movie Works Despite Script Problems


Hi Reader,

I’ve been thinking about something that comes up a lot in movies - especially controversial ones: why do some films still connect with audiences even when the script clearly has problems?

That’s what got me thinking about Citizen Vigilante. I watched it the other night, and whatever your personal politics or reaction to the movie, it’s actually a very useful case study for writers.

On one hand, the screenplay has some very real weaknesses:

  • thin motivation
  • little real character development
  • on-the-nose dialogue
  • an episodic revenge structure
  • and not nearly enough connective tissue between its major beats

And yet, for its intended audience, it still works. From a writing standpoint, this begs the million dollar question - Why?

It knows exactly who it’s for

One thing the film absolutely does right is that it knows its audience.

It's not trying to be for everyone, or trying to soften itself into something broad and safe.
On the contrary, it knows the emotional buttons it wants to push, and it pushes them hard.

That has value, because one of the fastest ways for a script to become forgettable is to become too vague about who it’s trying to reach.

It gives the audience an active lead

Another thing Citizen Vigilante does well is give the audience a protagonist who acts. The main character, Sanders, isn't passive. He doesn't just drift through the plot. No, he's decisive, capable, and constantly taking action.

That matters, especially in action thrillers and revenge stories.

The problem is that the script doesn't do enough to build out why he acts, or how those actions change him over time. And that’s where the movie leaves a lot on the table.

Conviction is not the same as craft

One of the biggest writing lessons, however, comes down to this - the movie has conviction, but lacks in craft. A writer needs both.

In other words, it commits to its tone and has a distinct point of view. One could say it even sounds like it believes in itself.

But, for the most part, the dialogue is too blunt, too expository, and too speech-like. The characters all say exactly what's on their minds, without any subtext.

Revenge is not a full plot

This is the other major issue - revenge can be a strong story engine, but it's not enough to drive the plot all by itself.

A revenge story still needs a wound, a personal stake, escalation, emotional progression, and dramatic structure.

That’s part of why Death Wish works better as a narrative comparison. It gives the audience a clearer personal through-line and a stronger sense of transformation in its main character.

In comparison, Citizen Vigilante has movement, but not enough shape.

In my latest video, I go much deeper into all of this!

🎥 Watch the full video here: CITIZEN VIGILANTE Review

video preview

And if you want help with your screenplay - character work, dialogue, pacing, structure, or figuring out why your script isn’t landing the way it should - I can help with that too.:

👉 My coaching calls - great for brainstorming, outlining, character work, and solving story problems early: Book Your Session today!

👉 My coverage packages - a great next step if you need meaningful developmental feedback before diving back into the draft: Click here!

👉 Rewrite to Greenlight - my ongoing developmental editing program for taking a script from almost there to funding or production-ready: Click here!

Remember, an audience connection matters, but the strongest scripts give you that and the story to back it up.

Until next time - keep writing, and stay creative!

Neil

video preview

P.S. Check out my feature film, Spin the Wheel - out now on Tubi!

Click here to watch for FREE: https://tubitv.com/movies/100030151/spin-the-wheel

And see my latest feature, Contamination, now on Amazon, AppleTV, Fandango, and Hoopla!

Learn more about storytelling, screenwriting, and filmmaking:​ www.neilchasefilm.com.

Looking for in-depth help with your script, story or film? Check out my one-on-one coaching services here.

Check out my Gothic horror-western novel, Iron Dogs, available in eBook, print, and audiobook.

**My emails may include affiliate links. You can read my full disclosure and privacy policy here.

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Neil Chase

Neil Chase is a story and writing coach, award-winning screenwriter, actor, and author of the horror-western novel, Iron Dogs. Neil believes that all writers have the potential to create great work. His passion is helping writers find their voice and develop their skills so that they can create stories that are both entertaining and meaningful. If you’re ready to take your writing to the next level, join the email list for writing tips and inspiration!

Read more from Neil Chase

Hi Reader, Tomorrow is Canada Day in my neck of the woods, and Independence Day is just around the corner for all my friends in the U.S. And no matter which one you celebrate, this time of year can feel like a chance to step away from the usual rush for a minute, spend time with family and friends, enjoy the summer, and hopefully take a much-needed break. But it’s also something else. With these holidays landing at the halfway point of the year, it’s a good reminder that we’ve reached a kind...

Hi Reader, Hope you've had a great week! One of the best screenwriting educations I ever got wasn't from a book, a course, or a contest. It came from making a short film. More specifically, from writing Boneyard Racers - a supernatural action-horror short that started with one very simple question from my producer, Preston: "Can we do anything with hearses?" It immediately got my creative gears turning, and that same night, I wrote the first draft. What came out of it was a kind of Fast &...

Hi Reader, Happy Friday! Let’s talk about something that seems small at first glance, but can make a big difference in how your screenplay reads: character introductions. I’ve done coverage on several scripts lately, and this has been one of the most common weak points. A major character shows up for the first time, and their introduction is something like: "Jane, 25, a young woman in a t-shirt and jeans." And that’s it. No sense of personality or energy. No clue as to what kind of person...